Cancelling The65Project

Cancelling The65Project
Sample Briefs on Sanctions and Ethical Issues in Lawfare following the 2020 Election.

King v. Whitmer Docket (Michigan District Court): Section 1927, Inherent Authority, Rule 11

ECF 85 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO STATE DEFENDANTS

ECF 85 Exhibit 1
ECF 85 Exhibit 2

ECF 93 PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO INTERVENOR DEFENDANT ROBERT DAVIS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ECF 93 Exhibit 1
ECF 93 Exhibit 2
ECF 93 Exhibit 3
ECF 93 Exhibit 4

ECF 95 PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO THE CITY OF DETROIT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ECF 109 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION

ECF 109 Exhibit 1
ECF 109 Exhibit 2

ECF 111 PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ECF 111 Exhibit 1

ECF 120 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

ECF 120 Exhibit 1
ECF 120 Exhibit 2

Sixth Circuit Docket (King Appeal): Section 1927, Inherent Authority, Rule 11

DKT 27 CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF OF APPELLANTS

DKT 60 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS
DKT 67 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure RULE 28 (J) Filing 1
DKT 68 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure RULE 28 (J) Filing 2
DKT 70 ERRATA TO CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF OF APPELLANTS
DKT 73 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure RULE 28 (J) Jill Stein Litigation
DKT 74 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure RULE 28 (J) King v Whitmer

Cancelling The65Project

Cancelling The65ProjectSample Briefs on Sanctions and Ethical Issues in Lawfare following the 2020 Election.

King v. Whitmer Docket (Michigan District Court): Section 1927, Inherent Authority, Rule 11

Sixth Circuit Docket (King Appeal): Section 1927, Inherent Authority, Rule 11

Cancelling The65Project
Sample Briefs on Sanctions and Ethical Issues in Lawfare following the 2020 Election.