Dear Patriots,

At the start of Covid-CCP hysteria, we asked you all to take charge of your health and become as healthy as possible. We know that healthy people are harder to push around. We continue to urge you to do your own research to make the changes to have strong immunity and strong bodies and minds.

There has been a lot of new information and research about Covid-CCP and the injections. There is still a lot of lying about it.

1- Pfizer knew about adverse effects of their injection before they force it on everyone. In the past, this number of adverse effects would have gotten an injection pulled. That Pfizer and the government continue to push this is criminal.

Joseph Gehrett, MD; Barbara Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt at Daily Clout

542 Neurological Adverse Events, 95% Serious, in First 90 Days of Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Rollout.
16 Deaths. Females Suffered AEs More Than Twice As Often As Males.

QUOTE: The War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) – Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt – produced an alarming review of the neurological System Organ Class (SOC) adverse events found in Pfizer document 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-FEB-2021 (a.k.a., “5.3.6”). This SOC includes altered function of the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves.

It is important to note that the adverse events (AEs) in the 5.3.6 document were reported to Pfizer for only a 90-day period starting on December 1, 2020, the date of the United Kingdom’s public rollout of Pfizer’s COVID-19 experimental mRNA “vaccine” product.

Key points in this report include:

• 542 neurological events, 95% of which were serious, occurred in 501 patients.
• 16 patients died.
• 50% of events occurred within the first 24 hours after injection, equating to over 270 events in a single day.
• 69% of the neurological events affected females, and 31% occurred in males.
• 376 seizures were reported, twelve of which were “status epilepticus,” a rare condition of prolonged seizure or series of seizures that is life-threatening.
• 38 cases of multiple sclerosis.
• 11 cases of transverse myelitis (a destructive inflammation of the spinal cord).
• 10 cases of optic neuritis (inflammation of the optic nerve threatening blindness).
• 24 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, ascending paralysis from nerve inflammation.
• Three cases of meningitis (infection and inflammation of the fluid and membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord).
• Seven cases of encephalopathy (any disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure; hallmark is altered mental state).
• Only adverse events that occurred two or more times are specifically reported in the diagnoses list. There were twenty events that happened once and, thus, were not included.

2- The unaccountable lying by people in government positions is stunning. There does not seem to be any shame. Our elected representatives listen to all of the lies and nothing happens. Americans are understandably frustrated.

Brownstone Institute

Rochelle Walensky’s Terrible Testimony

QUOTE: Last week, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky gave testimony to Congress that was jaw-dropping even by the abysmal standards to which we’ve been accustomed during COVID. In just a few hours, Walensky managed to tell Congress that the CDC’s guidance to mandate masks in schools would never change regardless of new evidence, that the CDC had conducted no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as to whether masks were effective because it was so obvious that they worked, and that COVID vaccines had been added to the child immunization schedule so they could be given to uninsured children.

First, in light of the recent Cochrane review including 78 peer-reviewed RCTs with over 600,000 participants concluding masks made “little to no difference” in preventing COVID or flu, Walensky told Rep. Cathy Rodgers that the CDC’s guidance to mandate masks in schools would “not change with time” regardless of the new evidence.

Walensky’s response is astonishing for several reasons. First, to say that the CDC’s masking guidance “does not change with time,” despite the recent Cochrane review, is effectively to admit that the CDC’s guidance does not change with new data or evidence, either. This is a far cry from the commitment to “science” which the American people had long been told they were following.

If that’s not bad enough, Walensky’s statement is, of course, also flatly untrue. After discouraging Americans from obtaining facemasks in the initial weeks of COVID, the CDC made an abrupt about-face in April 2020, and facemasks soon became mandatory for day-to-day activities, which the CDC at the time had attributed to a change in “science.” Making all this even more horrific is the fact that the United States stands out conspicuously as the only developed nation in which its national public health agency recommends masking children as young as two years old.

Next, Walensky goes on to tell Rep. Gary Palmer that no one in the US federal government would have thought to propose an RCT to determine if masks were effective because “there wasn’t equipoise to the question anymore.”

Effectively, Walensky is saying that the CDC wouldn’t consider conducting an RCT, widely considered the “gold standard” of evidence-based medicine, because it was so obvious that masks worked.

Finally, Walensky tells Rep. Dan Crenshaw that the only reason COVID mRNA vaccines had been added to the routine pediatric immunization schedule for all children over six months old was so that they could be given to uninsured children.

As has been known since early 2020, COVID poses virtually zero risk to young children. That there have been 2,000 pediatric deaths from COVID is belied by the CDC’s own data—and the vast majority of these children had severe comorbidities.

3- After three years of hammering Americans to get the jabs, the Lancet finally tell us what we all instinctively knew. When you recover from having Covid-CCP your immunity is stronger and last longer than anything you might get from injections,

Children’s Health Defense

‘Finally’ The Lancet Acknowledges Natural Immunity Superior to mRNA COVID Vaccines

QUOTE: Immunity acquired from past COVID-19 infection provides strong, lasting protection against severe outcomes from the illness at a level “as high if not higher” than that provided by mRNA vaccines, according to a study published Thursday in The Lancet.

Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 65 studies worldwide, providing overwhelming evidence to support what many scientists, doctors and studies have said since early in the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The Lancet is finally acknowledging what doctors and scientists have been gaslit for saying for years — that natural immunity provides superior protection to experimental vaccines,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense.

“Only the tsunami of propaganda and censorship from the pharma/government biosecurity cartel and the controlled media persuaded the public that Pfizer and Moderna were better at protecting the human immune system than God and evolution,” he added.

The study found that immunity acquired from infection was often far more robust and consistently waned more slowly than the immunity from two doses of an mRNA vaccine.

4- No one, least of all college aged students, should be getting anymore injections. Universities that still mandate booster injections should be shunned.

Children’s Health Defense

Why Are Colleges Still Mandating COVID Vaccines for Students?

QUOTE: If college bureaucrats aren’t willing to end their reckless and outdated COVID-19 policies now, parents will shift their support to colleges that do.

Headlines last week declared natural immunity better protection than vaccines, based on a Lancet study that backed up a groundbreaking Israeli study from August 2021.

Yet vaccine mandates continue to block a full return to normalcy, and it’s taking a particularly hard toll on college kids.

Three years in — and well after COVID-19 ceased to be a deadly, nationwide threat — many institutions are still reluctant to let go of pandemic restrictions.

Parents have come to see how those lingering rules have hit the young especially hard. For college students, campuses feel forever altered under the weight of the ubiquitous refrain “to keep the community safe.”

Even those who advocated for vaccine mandates and lockdowns now talk of “pandemic amnesty,” quietly turning their attention to the unintended consequences of the pandemic response instead.

But bureaucracy lags far behind. It operates at its own speed, regardless of common sense, critical thinking or harmful impact.

College vaccine mandates are a glaring example of this phenomenon; after all, vaccine mandates are simply not effective in protecting the community. How could they be if they don’t prevent transmission? Nonetheless, they remain stubbornly the norm in New York and elsewhere.

One of the most outrageous college mandates can be found on SUNY campuses. Shockingly, it only applies to students: Older, more vulnerable faculty and staff are not required to take vaccines, making it one of the most egregious and legally questionable mandates still standing.

5- Dr. Malone offers information on a supplement that has proven to help many conditions. Of course, it is natural and Big Drug will make no money, so, you probably have not heard of it. We are not recommending this for you. We are offering information so that you can make your own decisions. We are offering this as an example of how Big Drug denies us helpful medicine because they do not profit from them. Read more about Berberine at the link.

Robert W Malone MD, on Substack

Well Being: Berberine

QUOTE: While at the Brownstone Institute retreat near Hartford, CT this weekend, I heard Dr. Paul Marik speak on repurposed drugs. Of course, this has been one of my passions since the Ebola outbreak of 2014, with the realization that a safe and effective vaccine could not be developed fast enough for any newly emergent highly infectious disease or infectious bio-threat event. Unfortunately, there is no interest in using repurposed drugs by our government or pharma for other disease indications such as cancer. This is despite the fact that computerized modeling, which is very sophisticated, suggests that there are many drugs for which the already licensed drug’s safety profile is well known, that would work well for varying types of cancers. Again, no profit motive, no interest. No research dollars or support. A dead end.

One of the key examples used during Dr. Marik’s lecture at the Brownstone retreat was the compound Berberine. As Berberine is derived from plants, it is considered a nutraceutical. As a consequence, there are few randomized clinical trials and little pharma or government interest in the drug. Probably because there is no profit motive at play here. Hence, most of us have never heard of it.

One of Dr. Marik’s main points was that berberine appears to be one of the most powerful tools we have to regulate insulin and yet, because there is no profit in promoting this product, there is almost no publicity or significant research into its clinical benefits.

Traditional medicines use many plants that are true miracles provided to us by nature. Berberine is found in many plants through out the world, and has has been used as an essential medicine globally for more than 3000 years. Traditionally, its uses have varied greatly and include treating infections, sores, and as an antimicrobial for various kinds of gastrointestinal inflammation.

6- Many of you may be interested in this conference focusing on Covid-CCP litigation. As more injuries and death come to light, It is expected that there will be a massive number of suits brought against companies, universities, hospitals and government agencies who forced injection mandates,

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

Covid Litigation Conference Saturday, March 25 & Sunday, March 26
Starling Atlanta Midtown Hilton Atlanta, Georgia

The Covid Litigation Conference 2023 (CLC 2023) is a unique gathering of trial lawyers advancing Covid-19-related litigation. Over the next 10 years, Covid lawsuits are projected to experience tremendous growth. The conference will offer networking opportunities and panel discussions led by attorneys engaged in Covid-19 litigation. The conference is designed for an attorney audience; however, the public is also welcome to purchase tickets.





















Get Healthy. Pray. Read. Share.
Hold Fast,
Defending The Republic

To SHARE with a friend – SEND THEM THIS LINK